When
reading Kohn’s article, overall I noticed that he was kind of all over the
place. He started his essay with one topic and then ended it with another. He used
his own arguments to make his other arguments invalid. He does use a lot of
logos when he is trying to prove his first argument that grade inflation doesn’t
exist but the next argument states that if grade inflation did exist it would
be okay, which invalidates his original argument. It was very confusing to read and hard to understand exactly what Kohn was trying to argue because he was going back and forth between what he was originally trying to prove and the opposite of that as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment